Monday, June 27, 2016

FBI Finds No Evidence of Media's Favorite Orlando Gay Revenge Theory

http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2016/06/omarmateen_1.jpg?itok=NAnTNBgi


If anyone needed more evidence that Muslims come ahead of gay people in the left's Victim Value Index, consider the fact that the media has been very aggressive in denying that Omar Mateen's massacre in Orlando had anything to do with Islam, while insisting on pushing a gay revenge angle. Even though there's no actual evidence for it. According to that notorious right-wing organization, the FBI.
Several Pulse regulars have come forward in the days since the shooting, claiming to have seen Mateen at the club or to have been contacted by him on the gay dating apps Grindr, Jack’d and Adam4Adam.
On Tuesday, Univision aired a report in which “Miguel,” a man wearing a disguise to conceal his identity, alleged he had sex with Mateen after meeting him on the gay dating app, Grindr. He said Mateen had sex with other men too, including a threesome with a Puerto Rican who allegedly told Mateen, after having had unprotected sex with him, that he was HIV positive.
But investigators do not consider the man’s account credible, according to one senior law enforcement official with access to the investigation.
That hasn't stopped the media from pushing the account non-stop because it diverts attention from Islam.
Now whether or not Omar liked the lads really has as little to do with it as Nidal Hasan's military role. Like Farook and Hasan, Omar picked a place he knew well in order to carry out the attack. That's what terrorists do. It doesn't change the simple fact that his stated motives were Islamic and that he had a history of making Islamic terror threats.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

No comments:

Post a Comment