Monday, November 30, 2015

3 Reasons Neil Strauss And Tucker Max Abandoned The Ideas That Made Them Rich And Famous

Of course like every other sport eventually you get too old for it. You won’t have the energy for it, you’ll become more injury prone and you won’t be as competitive. Then you’ll have to find some other way to make a living and/or amuse yourself. Naturally the more money you have in the bank the more attractive you will continue to be to women, even as you age.

Articles: Islam, rape, and the fate of Western women

Muslim men rape non-Muslim women (and girls) in disproportionately high numbers in countries with growing Muslim minority populations. Rape of infidel women is part of Islamic law and Islamic tradition. As such, it’s been going on for centuries.
This article is about the current threat Muslim rapists pose to non-Muslim women. In order to keep this article to a reasonable length, the focus is on the rape epidemic in Europe, but suffice it to say rape jihad is a gruesome reality the world over.
Perhaps there is no European country where rape has reached epidemic proportions as it has in Sweden, a country now known as the “rape capital” of Europe. Sweden ranks Number 2 on the global list of rape countries. From 1975 to present, rape in Sweden has increased 1472%. Based on this model, it is now projected that one in four Swedish women (and sometimes little girls) will be raped. Rape of men and boys is also on the rise.
Making this nightmarish situation worse, the authorities hide what’s going on, make outlandish excuses for it, and/or side with the rapists. Dhimmitude has taken hold. Few, if any, will state the truth: that the majority of rapes in Sweden are committed by Muslim males.
Of note, a large number of Muslim rapists are under the age of 18 and, if brought to “justice,” receive exceedingly light sentences (even lighter than the absurd non-punishment adults receive) because they are considered juveniles. And so they are released back onto the streets in a flash. To commit more rape. Related to this issue is the fact that many Muslim men in Sweden are classified as “unaccompanied children” when they arrive.
The sickness that has taken over Swedish culture is so shocking that in one case where a Somali Muslim was found guilty of raping a dying woman to death (which is horrific enough), the judicial system refused to send him back to Somalia because they determined he would be just as much a risk to women in Somalia as he would be to women in Sweden. And so Swedish women were disregarded out of deference to Somali women.
(To learn more about the rape epidemic in Sweden see hereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehere, herehereherehereherehere,herehereherehereherehere, and here.)
But Sweden is not the only European country where rape has become commonplace. Importing Muslims en masse has taken a toll across the continent. With the recent avalanche of young Muslim males sweeping across Europe, violence is rising even further. Including rape.
In the United Kingdom rape is occurring on such a massive scale that women no longer feel safe taking a taxi cab. Meanwhile, Muslim child sex trafficking gangs have become so pervasive it is estimated there may be as many as one million victims. One million! It has been referred to as rape on an “industrial scale.” And how has this massive attack against non-Muslim girls in the United Kingdom been addressed by the authorities? They’ve covered up the truth, often blaming the victims. Political leaders, the police, the courts, the media. You name it. They’re overflowing with cowards, leaving children to suffer the unthinkable horrors of kidnapping, torture, and rape.
(To learn more about rape, including child sex trafficking operations in the UK, see herehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehere,hereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehere, and here.
In Holland, sex trafficking gangs run by Muslim men are also on the rise. In Germany, rape committed by “asylum seekers” is skyrocketing as rape by Muslim men is explained away as “cultural misunderstandings.” So to avoid such “misunderstandings” girls are told to cover up lest they draw attention to themselves and be raped.
In Austria, women are feeling the impact of this current avalanche of Muslim invaders, as when a 72-year-old woman was recently raped by a 17-year-old “asylum seeker.” In France, gang rape is on the rise. As with the rest of Europe, if the rapists are brought to trial they barely serve time for their heinous crime. In Spain, the situation is so dire that women don’t leave their house after dark for fear of being raped by Muslim men.
In Denmark, more than half of convicted rapists are Muslims. In Norway, there has been a dramatic spike in rapes. In Oslo, 10% of females over the age of 15 have been raped by Muslim men with Muslim men guilty of 100% of the rapes against Norwegian women. Rape in Oslo is now so common that hotels hand out key chain alarms when people check in and increasingly Norwegian women only go out in groups. As is the case throughout the West, anyone who speaks the truth about this is labeled a “racist.”
(To learn more about rape jihad across Europe, see hereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehere, and here.)
Meanwhile, in the face of this savagery, our political leaders, the media, academics, Muslims, feminists, and/or garden variety lemmings assert that Islam respects women, that it does not sanction the mistreatment of women, and/or that Western culture is a rape culture on par with ISIS. But no matter how persistently or how deeply these fools keep their increasingly vulnerable heads in the sand, it will not change reality. Quite the opposite. By denying the truth, these liars, apologists, and moral relativists fuel violence, rape, torture, enslavement, and death.
We must (more than) make up for the damage they inflict. So let us get about the task of educating others to make sure this reality does not take hold in America. Let us do our part to make sure that women and girls in the United States do not wind up victims of rape jihad.

Blog: Interesting family background of the Colorado Springs shooter

As if we needed further proof: the country is full of whackos and they are allowed to run loose and inflict their insanity on the rest of us. Another reason we should never give up our guns.

Many outlets have been saying the Colorado Springs shooter was from Western North Carolina, where I live. Since I have been active in the local prolife community, this bothered me.  So I did a little snooping on-line. 
I found that Dear does own property in Buncombe County (Asheville) though he lists his address on the property records for both parcels as South Carolina. The properties are low end. He also appears to have a residence in unincorporated Hartsel, Colorado and was registered to vote there as an unaffiliated voter. I'd say that makes him a Colorado resident. He never registered to vote in North Carolina.
Since Dear doesn't seem to have held a regular job, one has to wonder how he paid his bills. Property taxes are probably low on those two parcels, but it still takes ready cash. The family is from South Carolina. I have to wonder if the tax bills go to a relative or trustee there.  From a professional point of view, he seems to me like the type of person whose inheritance might be put in a spendthrift trust. And I do suspect there might be some money in his family.  One report says Dear listed his occupation as a "self employed art dealer." That's not usually an occupation for someone with middle or working class roots.
His full name is actually Robert Lewis Dear, Jr.   His namesake was a WWII veteran and Citadel graduate who was employed by Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company for 40 years.  During that time the family may have relocated for business more than once, as senior's obituary noted he lived in Florida, Kentucky and Missouri before he returned to his native South Carolina for the last 15 years of his life. Senior was a joiner -- a member of theHonorary Order of Kentucky Colonels and the Citadel Brigadiers Club. Poor people don't tend to be invited into such beneficial organizations. The well-to-do are also more likely to clam up whenever a relative brings disgrace to the family name. So far I have not heard a peep from the extended family and all the names were in the easy to find obituary. 
Unlike his sire, Dear Jr. is said to be a loner. He had no on-line presence anyone has found.  He lived in Walterboro, SC for several years, where he was far from unknown to the local authorities because of a variety of incidents -- complaints of domestic violence, animal abuse, peeping tom.  From those reports he seems to be a bit of a paranoid crank, quick to take offense at a neighbors while oblivious to when he gave offense.  But he was still middle class enough to call the police to assist him from time to time.  Once in SC he claimed his motorcycle was damaged by a neighbor.   Another time he called in the law in a dispute with a tenant over installment payments on a truck she had purchased from him and then claimed it had disappeared when he tried to repossess it.   The appliances also disappeared when the tenant moved out of the place she had rented from him.  The lack of job information for a man his age plus these reports that indicate poor judgment/erratic behavior fits the pattern of a child of the upper middle class who may inherit via a spendthrift trust.
I suspect the media may quickly lose interest. He probably doesn't fit a convenient narrative for them, as he seems far more mentally ill than politically motivated.  The Asheville Citizen Times, which makes the Minneapolis Star-Tribune look almost middle of the road, has found no evidence of any political motivations in Dear.
From what I have found so far, Dear looks like a pretty sad figure, the not quite right in the head child who never grew up.  He apparently never got along all that well with people even before he dropped out to live off the grid.  I have to wonder if his parents never stopped contributing to his upkeep and that when senior was alive junior was kept on a short enough leash to seem respectable. 
In Walterboro, Dear Jr. had a wife, at least one child and a home in a day trip tourist town known for historic preservation and quaint antique stores/folk art galleries. Then in recent years his life seems to have gone off the tracks.  Perhaps the combination of divorce, the death of his father and an economic environment in which those who are too difficult for other people to deal with simply won't find work was the trigger that sent him into an off the grid shack on Black Mountain.
A neighbor in North Carolina reported
You can tell his personality is just off. The way he looked at you, the way he talked, he just seemed off,” said James Russell, who lives a few hundred feet down the mountain. “If you talked to him, nothing with him was very cognitive — topics all over place.”
There is no information so far on why Dear, Jr. moved to Colorado after apparently spending so many years in the Carolinas.  It would be funny if legalized pot has something to do with it.   He does look like quite a few of the badly aging hippies, many of them scions of respectable, affluent families, who get drawn to low cost of living communities in areas around towns like Asheville or Colorado Springs.

Vox Popoli: Just one trick

The thing we have to fear the most is Leftist-Progressives themselves . Whatever they do they will make a mess of it. Anything they try to fix they will destroy.

Just one trick

And yet, it's astonishing how well it works:
Progressives only have one good trick, and men keep falling for it.

They keep calling you a coward, so that you’ll do or say whatever they want to prove that you are not a coward.

If they want you to accept a group of outsiders, they call you a xenophobe to dismiss any rational concerns you might have about the motivations of strangers. The only way to prove you don’t have an irrational fear of foreigners is to welcome them with open arms and without questions.

If you question the sanity of a man who can’t be “who he really is” until someone surgically removes his dick, they call you a transphobe. The only way to prove you’re not afraid of trannies is to agree that transsexuals are not only sane, but heroic, and should be welcomed into any women’s restroom.

If you reject any demand made by any woman, you’re “just afraid of a strong woman.” This accusation has been repeated so many times that a substantial portion of the population actually seems to believe that men are at the very core of their being constitutionally terrified by any woman with “attitude.” There is probably some truth to this, but only to the extent that men would rather avoid the frustrating reality that no matter how strong a woman claims to be or what she says, no man or woman on earth will ever forgive a man for knocking her the fuck out. To prove they are not afraid of women, men end up giving women whatever they want, because they can’t stand up to women the way they stand up to each other.

Progressives get men to do whatever they want by manipulating our fear of being afraid. When you recognize this manipulation, you’ll begin to see it in nearly every argument appealing to men and every progressive narrative written about men. Their strategy is to portray masculine men, even men who have demonstrated courage in battle or in legitimately heroic endeavors where they have faced and overcome fear, as being driven primarily by fear and a sense of inadequacy.
So stop being a coward by reacting in a kneejerk fashion to everyone who threatens to call you one. Either ignore or blithely agree with their attempt to disqualify you and carry on. That's all they've got.

What to Do About Guns and the Mentally Ill

The remedy to the very real problem of gun violence would be achieved by simply enforcing the laws we currently have.

While international terrorism has captured the attention of the media this autumn, the gun violence agenda on the home front is never far below the surface during a presidential election cycle. We are reminded of this with every stump speech by Hillary Clinton and each poorly publicized Democrat debate.
There are the usual calls for bans on so-called “assault weapons” or magazines capable of holding more than two rounds and a stick of gum, along with the ubiquitous demands for more and better background checks. But one of the trendiest talking points being deployed this season is the demand the we do something about all of the crazy people who seem to have guns and occasionally take them out to create mayhem in very public -- and generally gun-free -- zones such as schools and churches.
Fair enough. It’s clearly a reasonable goal, since no responsible person wants the criminally insane or dangerously incompetent to be wandering about with a potentially lethal tool like a firearm. So how shall we accomplish this laudable improvement in our shared society?
Ah, there’s the rub. When you ask for specifics, the Democrats and their media allies mostly fall silent. The few who do not seem to fumble around for definitions which could never be crafted into a self-respecting bill that could pass constitutional muster, or they propose sweeping categories which would catch half the nation in their nets. Even when they nibble around the edges we seem to run into trouble. One example of this was when Barack Obama himself pitched the idea of tying gun rights to the status of Social Security recipients. Under such a plan, any person who designated another person to process their forms, cash their checks, or in any other way deal with their account would be defined as being “unable to manage their own affairs” and have their gun rights revoked.
Trust me when I tell you that I’ve met a few elderly recipients in my family who probably shouldn’t have a gun, so this idea isn’t based entirely in fantasy. But by the same token, there are some who simply aren’t that good at managing their own money any more or are getting help from their children and turn over such affairs to them. That doesn’t mean that they might not need to defend themselves from a burglar or simply enjoy plinking the occasional target. Blanket definitions such as the one proposed by the president are a sure path to expensive court challenges where the “accused” will have to prove themselves competent before they are allowed to exercise their constitutional rights. Such an approach turns the idea of freedom on its head.
Other plans, including a few proposed in the wake of the Oregon shooting, seek to create a database of people who have been determined by “professionals” to be mentally unstable. This makes perfect sense if you believe that anyone who has ever sought out any sort of mental health treatment or therapy is automatically dangerous or crazy. This is disconcerting to any supporter of the Second Amendment because the American Psychological Association has been keeping track of these numbers for decades and they report that nearly one half of all American households have at least one member who seeks some sort of mental health treatment each year. I’m not here to claim that Hillary Clinton would like to wipe out all the guns from half the households in America, but I’m also not about to say that she’d mind it very much.
If you want to see what such a government database of the mentally ill looks like in action, we’re not just dealing with hypotheticals here. Look no further than New York State, where the passage of the hilariously named “SAFE Act” in 2013 mandated the creation of just such a list. The claimed intent, as previously implied, was to establish a list of dangerously insane individuals, revoke their gun rights, and remove their weapons in the name of the public weal. But as it was worded, any resident could have their name submitted to this database by a psychiatrist, a psychologist, a therapist, or a pharmacist who just had a feeling that the person was off kilter. People began having their names put in for transgressions ranging from telling a therapist they were depressed to being prescribed anti-anxiety medication for a short period of time. By November of 2014 when the New York Times finally managed to get the state government to admit to the existence of the list, it contained more than 34,000 names. The number of guns confiscated in total remains unknown since the governor’s office claims they don’t track such things, but individual reports of confiscationcontinue to this day.
This is what happens when you write the government a blank check in terms of curtailing your constitutional rights. Given an inch, far too many of them will take a country mile and more. The fact is that we already have a system in place for determining when someone is too unstable or incompetent to possess firearms and it involves having the government adjudicating them through the process of a public hearing. In the course of such an action, the “accused” at least has the chance to make their case and prove their competence if the charges are specious.
What’s lacking in the current system is not a faster way to declare citizens insane, but a functional method of assembling and disseminating the data regarding those who are truly dangerous. In too many cases that’s simply not being done and it allows for holes in the already adequate background check system. If the states can manage to fix that problem, we might be willing to talk about tweaking it a bit in the future.
As with so many subjects when it comes to gun control, the remedy to the very real problem of gun violence would be achieved by simply enforcing the laws we currently have and putting smart people in charge of administering the system. But since we can’t seem to manage that, Democrats will continue to conclude that more and “better” laws are needed, ignoring the fact that the worst violent crime rates in the nation remain stubbornly high in the places with the strictest gun laws. As for the crazy people… perhaps we need to examine those seeking elected office a bit more closely before we go chasing down the hoi polloi.

Heard About The “Minnesota Man” Who Kidnapped And Raped A Teenage Boy In A “Dungeon”? He’s Black

FYI: Hate  crime legislation is only intended to be implemented against white people. Got to roll back  “white privilege” don’t you know. It’s part of the “fundamental transformation” of the country.

Note that Wilbert Glover benefited from massive criminal justice affirmative action. He should have gotten life without parole for the murder charge alone. He got 40 years. He should have gotten life for the kidnapping charge alone. He got six years. And he should have gotten 20-to-life for attempted murder alone. He got six years.
But he appears to have murdered someone he kidnapped, which is a federal death penalty offense (kidnapping is federal), aside from his additional attempted murder.
So, instead of getting the needle, he did a lousy 21 years in medium security, “Dixon State University.”
“Illinois Department of Corrections records show Glover was convicted in the 1980s of kidnapping and attempted murder.”
I guess he got a freebie for the murder.
If you kidnap someone, and he somehow dies during or immediately after the crime (e.g., from a heart attack, immediately after being released), that’s capital murder, regardless of who pulled the trigger. It’s just like being the getaway driver on a bank heist, where your partners murder someone inside the bank. In for a dime, in for a dollar. However, over the past 50 years or so, jurors who are fans of black cut-throats have increasingly engaged in various degrees of jury nullification.
For instance, during the early 1970s, black supremacist cut-throat Robert “Sonny” Carson led his gang in a kidnapping of two men,murdering one and shooting and leaving for dead the second vic. In a travesty of justice, the Brooklyn jury convicted Carson of kidnapping, but not of murder, and sentenced him to virtually no time.
Now, the $64 question is, What race is the 19-year-old vic? Was this possibly a hate crime by a man who may have committed the same hate crime countless times inside? Ultra-violent black homosexuals are obsessed with raping whites–men and women alike.
It makes you also wonder what race Glover’s vics were 30 years ago.
Wilbert Glover was booked in Cook County, IL.
The following Official Record of Wilbert Glover is being redistributed by and is protected by constitutional, publishing, and other legal rights. This Official Record was collected from a Law Enforcement agency on 3/01/2011. Last updated on 10/11/2013. ID: 240343
DOC Number: N73280
Inmate Status: PAROLE
Birth date: 4/13/1960
Weight: 164 lb (74 kg)
Hair Color: Black
Gender: Male
Height: 5′ 10? (1.78 m)
Race: Black
Eye Color: Brown
Admission Date: 9/04/1987
Parole Date: 9/26/2008
Projected Discharge Date: 9/28/2011
Scars / Marks / Tattoos: N/A
Sentence Information:
Field Name Field Value
CUSTODY DATE 12/28/1985
SENTENCE 40 Years 0 Months 0 Days
CUSTODY DATE 12/28/1985
SENTENCE 6 Years 0 Months 0 Days
CUSTODY DATE 12/28/1985
SENTENCE 6 Years 0 Months 0 Days
Here’s the Associated Press version:
By Associated Press
November 26, 2015, 7:48 PM
ST. PAUL, Minn. — Authorities say a 55-year-old man kidnapped a 19-year-old man from a Minneapolis street, took him to his St. Paul home, and kept him chained up while repeatedly sexually assaulting him over four days.
The victim escaped Tuesday and went to a neighbor’s for help. And on Wednesday, authorities charged Wilbert Glover with kidnapping and criminal sexual conduct.
Glover is being held on $1 million bail and is scheduled to make his first court appearance Monday. Online court records don’t list an attorney for him. The criminal complaint says Glover injured himself in a holding cell after banging his head on a door frame.
Illinois Department of Corrections records show Glover was convicted in the 1980s of kidnapping and attempted murder. He was released from prison in 2008.

GUN WATCH: FL: 'Muslim Free Zone' Gun Shop Owner Vindicated, CAIR Lawsuit Dismissed

Florida gun shop owner who was sued by the Council on American-Islamic Relations for declaring his store a “Muslim Free Zone” has been vindicated by a federal court.

Andrew Hallinan, owner of Florida Gun Supply in Inverness, was sued by CAIR’s Florida chapter after he made the declarationin a YouTube video in July.

On Tuesday U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom said Hallinan, who teamed up with George Zimmerman to raise funds for his legal defense, was within his First Amendment rights to make the statement, according to the American

“The general desire of [CAIR] in this case to have Muslims able to access [Florida Gun Supply’s] shooting range someday in the future is insufficient . . . There are simply no facts grounding the assertion that [CAIR] and/or one of its constituents will be harmed—[CAIR] has failed to allege when and in what manner the alleged injuries are going to occur,” the court ruled.
In the statement released Tuesday by AFLC it declared “Florida Gun Supply will not serve “[a]nyone who is either directly or indirectly associated with terrorism in any way.”

“As our motion and now the court’s ruling make clear, CAIR’s lawsuit was patently frivolous if not outright dangerous. No firearms dealer or gun range owner for that matter should be required to sell weapons to or train anyone that the dealer or owner has reason to believe is a terrorist threat. We all have a civic responsibility to prevent the next terrorist attack. CAIR’s lawsuit was an effort to prevent business owners from doing so,” AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel Robert Muise said in the statement.

VAPORIZED: The Moment An Islamic Extremist Filming A Propaganda Video Is Wiped Out By An Artillery Shell

It couldn’t have happened to a better bunch of Jihadis.

FBI using elite surveillance teams to track at least 48 high-risk ISIS suspects

With as many as 1,000 active cases, Fox News has learned at least 48 ISIS suspects are considered so high risk that the FBI is using its elite tracking squads known as the mobile surveillance teams or MST to track them domestically.

Police, migrants clash on Macedonia border; soldiers build fence

By Yannis Behrakis IDOMENI, Greece (Reuters) - Police in Macedonia fired tear gas and stun grenades at desperate migrants stranded for days at the Greek border and who are demanding passage to western Europe, as soldiers began erecting a metal fence to keep them out. Macedonia, along with other Balkan countries on the migrant route, began turning away "economic migrants" nearly two weeks ago. Human rights groups have criticized the decision, under which only Syrians, Iraqis and Afghans are all…

Merkel Threatens Europe—And The West

The first snow in Bavaria covered the tents sheltering thousands of illegal immigrants at the border between Austria and Germany as Angela Merkel showed up in Munich at the party congress of the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU), allied with her CDU (Christian Democratic Union). The atmosphere was not less frosty inside the hall, where the German Chancellor defended her policy of open doors for Muslim immigrants in front of a highly critical audience of Bavarian conservatives. [Chancellor Angela Merkel asks CSU party to stick with CDU allies in helping refugees, November 20, 2015]
Once again she repeated her mantra: Germany does not put any limit to the number of “refugees.” Her government instead would “fight against the reasons of their flight“, improve “the conditions in the refugee camps,” make sure that the whole of Europe would share the burden of caring for the “refugees“ and secure “the outer borders of the union“.
All these measures together would, supposedly, reduce the inflow of Syrians, Iraqis, Afghans and others to Germany—which in this year so far already exceeds one million.
Merkel tried to convince the auditorium that her government had everything under control and that there was “no alternative” to her policy of Open Doors. Her optimism was not shared by the CSU rank and file.
Bavaria is more affected by the invasion than any other region of Germany. The Bavarian PM and CSU head Horst Seehofer is well aware that he will be the first to pay the political price for the decisions taken in Berlin. Any support for the government depends first of all on stopping the mass influx, said Seehofer in Munich—challenging openly the Chancellor, who listened to his speech with a stony face.
Whenever Merkel appears in the streets she risks being booed, as happened in October in Stuttgart during a CDU rally. But this was the first time one of the most prominent Christian Democrats dared to lambaste her in public.
Thanks to its anti-immigration stand, the moderately rightist Alternative für Deutschland (AFD) is climbing in the polls and now ranks third after CDU/CSU and the Social Democrat SPD. It is particularly strong among the working class. The Christian Democrats, for the first time ever, have to fear the emergence of an alternative political force on the right.
Merkel´s “friendly face” policy to “migrants” threatens the very basis of the Christian Democratic hegemony. German taxpayers are beginning to understand that the millions of Euros spent on border controls over the past years have been a total waste of money. “We cannot close the borders,” Merkel says in language all too familiar to Americans, “if we construct a fence people will find other ways.” But, as Donald Trump has riposted, “if you think walls don’t work, all you have to do is ask Israel.“
Five years ago, before the mass invasion began to accelerate, Germany had a Muslim population of roughly 4 million, including 3 million of Turkish origin (immigrants from the 1960s plus their descendants) and 1 million from other countries, mostly Arabs. Islam was already the most numerous religious denomination among all “Germans with a migration background,” as immigrants are commonly called here. The German police listed at least 150 radical Muslims as potential terrorists.
With the sharp increase of immigration in the last two years, the Muslim population now exceeds 5 million, with the relative weight of Arabs augmented significantly. The police estimates that there are now 450 potential terrorists among them.
Thus Germany has witnessed under Merkel´s leadership not only an overall growth of the Muslim community, but also a shift towards ethnic groups that are particularly prone to radicalism and even more resistant to assimilation as the Turks. Until now there have been no ethnic riots in Germany like in the UK and France. But this peace will not last. It is only a question of time until the accumulated tensions in the parallel societies in and around the bigger cities will escalate into violence.
After 5 months of uncontrolled illegal mass invasion triggered by Merkel´s “friendly face,“ there are around 300,000 of unknown origin among the nearly 1 million immigrants. And nobody knows how many will still arrive. At least one of the Muslim killers in Paris passed the Balkan route with a faked passport.
The newspaper Die Welt reported recently an analysis done in the German Ministry of Home Affairs which simply expresses what an increasing number of German voters begin to understand: “We import Muslim extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic conflicts of other people. We import another concept of law and society.”[Sicherheitsexperten entsetzt über deutsche Politik, October 25, 2015 —Gatestone Institute translation]
The German police was prepared to secure the borders and to send back asylum seekers. But Merkel insisted on keeping the borders open. She refuses admit any link between mass migration and public security.
The Chancellor is supported by the Social Democrats, the Greens, the Churches, the Muslim community and the Leftist Establishment in the German Main Stream Media. Like her predecessor, the socialist Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, she is sensitive to the electoral power of the immigrants. Public TV and public broadcasting are on her side, partly because they depend on public money, partly because most of their journalists are Leftists. Talk show guests are in their overwhelming majority sympathetic towards Merkel´s policy. Conformism and political correctness dominate the public debate. The question whether it would not be better to block the invasion is invariably answered by a counter question: “Should our soldiers fire on those poor refugees?”
What is going on in Germany is nothing less than a revolution against common sense—and cultural suicide.
So nobody has an explanation of Angela Merkel. Has she been blackmailed? Has she been bribed? Has she gone mad? Is she intentionally destabilizing her country in the interest of a foreign power?
Her promise that the European partners would take care of the refugees has no real possibility of fulfillment. The burden will fall on the German taxpayers, and the working class.
And yet there is no change in sight. Merkel has nothing to fear from the Left, and she has no dangerous rivals in her own party because she got rid of them long ago.
There is a big difference between Mrs. Merkel and the long time Chancellor and CDU head Helmut Kohl. Kohl was a convinced Christian Democrat and a German patriot, deeply rooted in the conservative traditions of his country. Merkel has no principles. She sees the CDU as a mere vehicle and does not accept any ideological constraints. In the last 5 month, she has ignored the laws and the constitution of her own country as well as her European partners and international law.
She is a public danger—not only for Germany, but for Europe and the West as a whole.

Sunday, November 29, 2015

2703 Shootings, 440 Deaths Year-To-Date In Heavily Gun-Controlled Chicago - Breitbart

2703 Shootings, 440 Deaths Year-To-Date in Heavily Gun-Controlled Chicago

Doug Giles - Here’s Why Islam Wants Our Heads -- In THEIR Own Words

The other day I was talking to an acquaintance of mine at the gun range about the Paris terrorist attacks. What he surmised was the root cause of that senseless slaughter by Islamic radicals nearly made me drop my Sig Sauer on the range floor.
The Texan told me that he believes Islam wouldn’t be killing innocent peeps as they ate their dinner or enjoyed a death metal concert or watched a soccer game if said nutters had more “job opportunities”.
What he said was shocking to me because of two primary things:
1). A frickin’ Texan said that crap.
2). Someone really thinks if Ahmed was a barista at a Starbucks in Babbila that alone would make someone stoked on the 7th century murderous ramblings of a pedophile who believed God personally talked to him chill out regarding ill-will towards us “infidels”.
I think not.
Matter of fact, I think that particular job would actually make things much worse because he’d be all jacked up on caffeine and everyone would make fun of him for working at a Starbucks which would lead to … well … um … uh … more … ka-boom!
Indeed, many on the Left are still left wondering:
1). Why is Islam attacking Europe and America?
2). Is it because they feel unloved and so lonely?
3). Is Islam getting really tired of seeing Katy Perry’s constant display of her ample assets?
4). Is Islam enraged at Ryan Seacrest’s overuse of American Crew’s Molding Clay?
5). Is Islam not actually attacking us and it’s merely a few rogue scalawags that have hijacked what 
Obama calls a 'beautiful religion?'
Are one or more of the aforementioned the reason(s) why they're out of sorts with the West?
Many Europeans think that in order to get Islam to stop killing them they should open their borders even wider to their “refugees”, stop eating bangers and mash, tell Katy P to cool it with the cleavage and ban all male hair pomades. Especially those with the satanic “high shine” and “heavy hold”.
While a lot of Leftists, primarily, are getting wrapped around the angst axle wondering why Islam is in defcon mode with The West, and are thus changing their laws to accommodate Islam, being politically correct, banning Jello and the smell of BBQ, hoping that such concessions will get radical Muslims to calm down, I say we examine why they say they hate the West and are out to kill us.
Wes Walker, my buddy and religious editor over at my website, did a little poking around after the Paris attacks and found out that the reason why the Islamic State killed 100-plus and wounded hundreds of others was not because of political, economic or cultural reasons but were, instead, explicitly religious reasons.
Here’s Walker’s findings and his comments. Check it out:
When claiming responsibility for the Paris attacks IS said: “In a blessed battle … believers … set out targeting the capital of prostitution and vice, the lead carrier of the cross in Europe — Paris” (Quote in context here).
Two very specific points are made. They are attacking what they see as moral corruption, and they are attacking a city that — however untrue it may be today — historically, was very much associated with Christianity.
We love to point fingers at the Crusades, that they were a great historical evil, but neglect the wider context that Western armies were called upon in response to Islam’s aggressive Empire-building, militarily swallowing up of areas that were the seedbed of Christianity.
In previous generations, Europe was the breakwater that the waves of Islamic expansion crashed against before being turned away. Not so now. And that statement by the attackers sheds some light in it.
Previously, Europe resisted two pitfalls. We were not fully conquered — even when their military held the advantage — and more importantly, we were not assimilated. We were not, despite the fact that Islam’s dhimmi laws echo Secularism’s approach to rival religion in the public square -- suppression of traditional belief, and actively inviting, and rewarding its abandonment.
We were able to resist, because we held to something that defined us, called us to virtue, courage, endurance and hope. That same “something” was actively undermined by Enlightenment philosophers, and -- in Paris itself — saw a bloody purge during the Reign of Terror.
That “something” (historical Christian faith) was replaced with a variety of -isms, some of them religious, some of them political, others a more basically hedonistic grasping for money, pleasure or power.
So, when reporters gloss over the song that was playing when the slaughter began — “Kiss the Devil” — they overlook the very impetus of the attackers.
They believed themselves the righteous, purging the world of evildoers. They do not distinguish between the paganism or the Christianity of the West, believing the former to be part of the latter.
They attack us, because they still see us as the Great Enemy we once were, the same one that pushed back their empire, retaking Spain and Southeast Europe.
Our resistance is now feeble, in part, because we no longer know who we are, or for what we stand. We’ve jettisoned our values, and replaced them with Politically Correct platitudes.
And so, now that we’ve identified the moral vacuum, what will we do about it?
So, after reading Wes’s assessment and the killers’ own admissions of their motivations for the massacre in Paris, do you guys still think that more jobs, being PC with our beliefs and speech, and opening wide our borders to their hordes will get them to chill with their Islamic ill-will?