Thursday, December 31, 2015

At the height of the hectic Christmas shopping season in NYC, Muslim supremacists prostrate themselves in the middle of the street to pray to allah for the death of Donald Trump

Why are they praying for the death of Donald Trump? They should be praying for his protection and for him to live a long and successful life. After all he is doing Muslims a favor by proposing to keep them out of America which we all know is a stupid, evil, greedy, corrupt, unfair, racist, bigoted and violent place full of cruel, angry, violent Christian white people. Their favorite sport is played with a ball made of pigskin for goodness sakes. Why would Muslims want to come to America when they know they would not be safe here?



By BI: Unconcerned about blocking heavy Christmas traffic on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, filthy Muslim supremacists spread out their filthy rugs, get down on their hands and knees to pray outside Trump Tower as protesters denounce what they call a ‘fascist’ and ‘racist’ Republican candidate, Donald Trump. (What ‘race’ is Islam? What political system is more ‘fascist’ than Islam?)
 Dozens of Muslim jihadist wannabes lifted their asses in the air to allah outside‘s offices and campaign headquarters in New York on Sunday during a protest against the candidate’s rhetoric. Roughly two hundred Muslim scum attended the action in Midtown Manhattan, where some picketers said that the Republican presidential front-runner is a ‘fascist’ and a ‘racist.’
Trump has previously called for Muslims to be banned from coming to the US because of the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California. The candidate’s tower on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, which doubles as both his corporate offices and the center of campaign, has recently become the sight of protests because of the remarks.
Many Muslim demonstrators carried signs saying that they are not terrorists and should not be associated with terrorist groups such as ISIS.


Taqiyya: Muslim Cleric Denies Ties to San Bernardino Killers


Phone records tell a different story.
The cleric acting as spokesman for the San Bernardino mosque where terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook worshipped claims he barely knew Farook and didn’t know his terrorist wife at all. But phone records and other evidence uncovered by federal investigators cast suspicion on his story.
The FBI has questioned the cleric, Roshan Zamir Abbassi, about his phone communications with Farook — including a flurry of at least 38 messages over a two-week span in June, coinciding with the deadly Muslim terrorist attack on two military sites in Chattanooga, Tenn.
Abbassi, a Pakistani, insists he had nothing to do with the shooting at a San Bernardino County government building five miles from the mosque. While he confirms the text messages with Farook, he claims they were merely discussing food donations for his Dar-al-Uloom al-Islamiya of America mosque.
Abbassi maintained at a press conference that he didn’t know Farook any better than he knew the reporters in the room.
Therefore, you just know there's a "but" coming...
But members of the mosque say Farook was a fixture there. He had been coming to pray and study at least three times a week for two years. In fact, he memorized the Koran at there, something you cannot do without learning Arabic, a subject Abbassi teaches.
His other assertion that he never even saw Farook’s wife, Tashfeen Malik, also strains credulity. Malik joined her husband in shooting 35 of his government co-workers at a Christmas party. “No one knows anything about his wife,” assistant imam Mahmood Nadvi agreed. “She never came to prayer.
But longtime mosque member Gasser Shehata, who claimed to have prayed “shoulder to shoulder” with Farook, said Dar-al-Uloom prepared a chicken-and-rice dinner to celebrate the couple’s wedding last year. Reportedly, hundreds of congregants attended the walima reception, including the mosque leadership.
And people wonder why Donald Trump is doing so well in the national polls.

Watch 'Rosa Parks' get beat up on a bus

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jSph27WuZGc/hqdefault.jpg

Watch these female muggers beat the hell out this poor woman.



Where's the "What Would You Do?" television program when you need them?

Two black females viciously beat, choked, and kicked a woman on a bus in Long Beach, Calif. earlier this month. The victim appears to be about the same age as Rosa Parks when she was ordered to surrender her seat.

The victim in the video was "asked" to surrender her purse and backpack. When she refused, two female savages attacked her. Reports say the younger brother of one of the two attackers threatened passengers who were attempting to call authorities. All three were arrested.

• Urban savagery has been part of our culture for generation. The advent of the Internet coupled with the proliferation of video devices is allowing racist hate to be viewed by the public. Such attacks are seldom reported on the mainstream Marxist media.

• What would you do if your were attacked by two female savages? What would you do if your daughter, wife, sister, or granddaughter were attacked? (The victim appeared to be white or mixed race.)

• What will you do when white people are no longer a majority in the USA?

• What will you do when the federal government forces you to live among urban savages? When you can no longer flee to whitopian, suburban neighborhoods?

Click here to read more 'Rosa Parks' moments 
A Long Beach woman was arrested Thursday in connection to an attack and robbery on a Metro Blue Line train in the Rancho Dominguez area, according to authorities.

Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Transit Bureau officials said that on Tuesday, December 8, between 3:30 and 3:45PM, Aliyah Von Lewis, 18, allegedly approached a female victim and almost immediately began to punch her in the face and body while pulling her purse and backpack from her.

The assault was recorded on the train’s on-board video system and on the cellphone of a witness who posted the video to social media sites, Sheriff’s Transit Bureau official Ramon Montenegro said.

A Facebook community page about Von Lewis and the incident has also been created.

“In the videos, a second suspect, a 17-year-old female, can also be seen attacking the victim by repeatedly punching and kicking her,” Montenegro added. “The victim offered no resistance and appears to be trying to get away from the attackers.”

Von Lewis and the 17-year-old girl were arrested on Thursday and booked on suspicion of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon likely to produce great bodily injury, following an investigation by the Sheriff’s Transit Crime Impact Team that included combing social media.

The juvenile suspect’s 15-year-old brother was also identified and arrested on Monday on suspicion of attempting to prevent or dissuade a witness from calling the police and assault with a deadly weapon likely to produce great bodily injury.

Authorities said he is suspected of threatening a witness while the two females attacked the victim.

The victim tried to flee when the train stopped at the Del Amo Station in Rancho Dominguez but was attacked again and more of her property was taken, she told investigators.

She did not report the assault and robbery until the next day, said Montenegro.

Both juveniles were booked into Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall.

Von Lewis was booked at the Century Regional Detention Facility in Lynwood. She is being held in lieu of $100,000 bail as she awaits a December 29 court appearance in Compton, Sheriff’s officials said.

More arrests are possible as the investigation continues, Montenegro said.

Genius mayor explains why 2,000 teens rioted at Kentucky mall

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdnIHRE3iwEDO7XXebjmA8lN2aWPk9fC3npykZzrcY_hZqrVL7BV5AFtRQaRkdDHKbvo7CTYBW0khPDdu9Ato05O8txK2zwWPFvwV-XyVd4_a8psxDYf7bCw5uSW_EwHXe_DwL39qx8_us/s320/a.jpg

The city better buy them all an Xbox so they don’t get bored. Maybe the police ought to start monitoring the social media of everyone in town too. It’s a public forum after all, unless of course you block access to everyone, but selected friends and family. And everything you post on Facebook becomes the property of Facebook. Just like looking in someone’s front yard as you drive down the street. FYI the police already have search engine software that will allow them to search for fugitives and find things they post on social media like Facebook, My Space, Twitter and Instagram.


Ignoring the 600-pound gorilla in the room, the mayor of St. Matthews, Ky. says he knows why 2,000 "teens" ran riot through a shopping mall in his community.

Mayor Rick Tonini says social media and boredom are to blame, according to wdrb.com.

The mayhem began about 7 pm Saturday evening and continued for about one hour.

Local media failed to profile the teen rioters by race, but did profile them by age group. Most media also refused to publish photos or videos of the rioters, though such are accessible via the Internet. (see video below.)

Although reports say the teens were pounding each other, the mayor said they were just being noisy. The mayor was explaining why violent "teens" were not arrested. We suspect the mayor and police department feared being labeled "racist" if hundreds of black teens were arrested, causing us to wonder if the motto, To protect and the serve, applies to police in St. Matthews.  Chances are a white person is more likely to be arrested for speeding than a black for rioting in St. Matthews.

• St. Matthews is a small city within Louisville. The population was listed as 15,852 of whom 4.95% — or about 783 — are black. That leads us to presume that most of the "teen" rioters made their way to the mall via mass transit. The riot may have been coordinated by social media. If true, we wonder why Louisville police didn't notice the uptick in social media traffic.

• Prior to the advent of social media, Jim Crow laws were enacted to control black violence in public places. Jim Crow segregation laws were dominant in the South from 1865 to 1965 when civil rights legislation forced integration. Some say Jim Crow laws were an expression of white racism while others insist they existed as an effective means to control black violence such as the riot at the mall in St. Matthews.

Jim Crow laws in Kentucky included racially separate-but-equal schools, transportation, and some entertainment. To our knowledge retail establishments in Kentucky were not forced to comply with racial segregation.

The mayor of St. Matthews is speaking out after a chaotic holiday weekend at Mall St. Matthews.

Mayor Rick Tonini says social media and boredom are to blame.

The mall closed early Saturday evening after police say as many as 2,000 juveniles showed up, disturbing shoppers. Law enforcement from all over the area responded.

Mayor Tonini says it's likely that the teens didn't have anything better to do that night, and the mall became the hangout spot. He says he doesn't believe the kids meant any harm and supports police for not making any arrests.

"What are we going to arrest them for -- being noisy? There were some kids who were mouthy and a little bit belligerent towards the police," Tonini said. "I don't think, in this case arrests would have done anything but incite more panic."

Tonini is scheduled to meet with Mall St. Matthews management later today to discuss new policies that could help prevent this from happening again.


Biting the Hand That Holds Out the Olive Branch


I’ve noticed a trend: The more that white people apologize, the more they get mocked. The more they concede, the more that is demanded of them. The more frequently they make gestures of goodwill, the more they get emotionally sandblasted with malicious rhetoric about how “whiteness” is a poison that needs to be uprooted and eradicated. And what’s bitterly funny is that these well-meaning but fatally clueless Caucasoids can’t seem to figure out why this is happening.
The reason is simple: Self-hatred is never attractive, neither individually nor collectively, no matter who’s expressing it. It didn’t reflect well on blacks when movie clowns such as Mantan Moreland was bugging his eyes out and saying “Feets don’t fail me now!,” nor was it appealing when the heavy-lidded Stepin Fetchit played a shuffling, servile black idiot in every appearance.
Yet the default Virtue Mode these days for any white person who doesn’t want to be forever banished beyond the Pale—or should that be into the Pale?—is to bend over, grab their ankles, wince, and scream, “Pleeze, Massa, don’t hurt me!” They are sheltered and stupid enough to see such behavior as a virtue rather than a weakness. They appear to view it as a survival strategy rather than an invitation to murder.
The groups they’re trying to appease, though, aren’t nearly so naïve. Since people are animals—especially ones who’ve been encouraged their entire lives to view you as a natural predator who’s constantly seeking to kill, maim, defame, and oppress you—they tend to smell blood with every escalating gesture of compassion. It emboldens them to bite the hand that meekly holds out the olive branch.
“When white people don’t hate themselves, they end up doing something horrible—like ruling the world.”
Of course the clueless white ethnomasochists wind up getting hurt. It’s as if they’ve willingly allowed a giant KICK ME sign to be painted on their backs.
As was seamlessly documented in Howard Bloom’s The Lucifer Principle, most kings throughout history were overthrown not at the height of their despotism, but after they’d grown soft and started trying to make amends.
They say white people deserve to hate themselves for all the pain and death they’ve wrought. I say white people are loathsome these days because they’re uniquely susceptible to such idiotic guilt-tripping. That’s the problem with white people—not that it was so easy for them to conquer the world, but that it’s so easy to make them feel bad about it.
I sure as hell hate white people these days—they are by far my least favorite racial group—but not because they’re innately worth hating. It’s because they already hate themselves far too much, and they don’t wear it well. I have far more respect for all other groups because they respect themselves, whether it’s deserved or not.
It’s been a long process, but huge swaths of the globe’s Caucasian population have been snookered and hoodwinked and bamboozled into thinking that being history’s winners should be a matter of shame rather than celebration. You don’t see such servile self-abnegation among any other racial group on Earth. Has there been a demographic cluster in world history more thoroughly brainwashed into cheering its own demise than modern white people?
As our culture is currently dictated to us, white ethnomasochism is the only form of ethnic self-hatred that is currently deemed a virtue. Nonwhites are ritually scolded if they aren’t openly proud of their heritage, whereas whites are publicly reprimanded if they dare to notice anything in white history beyond slavery, colonialism, and the Holocaust.
Look with disgust upon these squirming white worms with their endlessly tacky public displays of self-flagellation, exulting in the idea of their own wickedness, trying to drown their historical sins in a cleansing wave of softly genocidal immigration. Afflicted with a perverse sort of racial body dysmorphia, they would crawl out of their white skin if they could only find a way.
This is the sort of thing that happens in the late stages of a crumbling empire, when the fat, lazy, and pampered have grown so soft they’ve blinded themselves to the wolf pack waiting at the door that’s eager to tear them to pieces.
Believe this—if white people actually held such iron-fisted power and were remotely as ruthless as they are portrayed, there would be no such mocking. People would be scared beyond belief to insult whites, because they’d be forced to deal with drastic consequences—you know, just as any white person these days is publicly destroyed for saying anything remotely unkind about nonwhites.
We are constantly lectured that there was nothing good about the “good old days,” that it was one giant charnel house of rape and plunder and exploitation.
Pictures say a thousand words, especially pictures of social justice warriors. Here’s a picture of Frank Joyce, a white man who recently pecked out a screed called “White men must be stopped.” And here’s a candidly horrifying snapshot of Gillian Schutte, a miscegenatin’ white South African slag who scribbled one of those endlessly tiresome “Dear White People” open letters to white people from a white person who is ostensibly enlightened enough to see whiteness as a cancer.
Those are faces that were born, marinated, and sculpted in a culture of relentless white guilt. They are ugly, defeated, self-hating, despicable mugs, the type that would likely enjoy being spat upon. If I were nonwhite, I’d feel entirely justified in walking up to such pathetic visages and saying, “Thanks for your apology—now give me your wallet.”
Then take a gander at John Wayne and Rita Hayworth back when there was no such thing as white guilt—back in the “bad old days” when there was no institutional culture of apology. In fact, look at nearly any white person in photos prior to the 1960s and tell me they don’t look more robust, dignified, and full of life than most welfare-siphoning, medication-gobbling, self-loathing, guilt-wracked, demoralized, virtue-signaling white folks these days.
People look better when they’re on the attack than when they’re in retreat. And that’s why most white people don’t look very good at all these days.
Nonwhites have a legitimate reason to fear an end of white self-loathing. When white people don’t hate themselves, they end up doing something horrible—like ruling the world.

Swiss Army Chief Warns Of Social Unrest, Calls Upon Citizens To Arm Themselves | Zero Hedge


Swiss army chief André Blattmann warned, in a Swiss newspaper article on Sunday, the risks of social unrest in Europe are soaring. Recalling the experience of 1939/1945, Blattman fears the increasing aggression in public discourse is an explosively hazardous situation, and advises the Swiss people to arm themselves and warns that the basis for Swiss prosperity is "being called into question."
speaking on the record for the first time since the November Paris terror attacks, Blattmann told the paper that despite a rise in security incidents over the past two years Switzerland’s means of defence were being reduced.
The situation is growing increasingly risky, Blattman begins.
"The threat of terror is rising, hybrid wars are being fought around the globe; the economic outlook is gloomy and the resulting migration flows of displaced persons and refugees have assumed unforeseen dimensions."
 Bloomberg Sponsored Content
Blattmann: "Social unrest can not be ruled out", the vocabulary in public discourse will "dangerously aggressive."
"The mixture is increasingly unappetizing" Blattmann sees the basis of Swiss prosperity, "has long been once again called into question."
He recalls the situation around the two world wars in the last century and advises Switzerland, to arm themselves.
The Swiss Armed Forces had held many years ago maneuver, in which the starting point was focused on social unrest in Europe.
*  *  *
Swiss politicians, of course, responded with disbelief to the army chief and hold his warnings are exaggerated.

The Rise Of The Temp Economy: More U.S. Employers Than Ever Want A "Disposable Workforce" | Zero Hedge


In this day and age it seems like almost everything is disposable, and many employers have found that they can make a lot more money if they have a workforce that can be turned on and off like a faucet. In America today, there are more than 17 million “independent workers”, and they represent a bigger share of the workforce than ever before.
Federal laws give a lot of protection to “full-time workers”, but for temporary and contract employees it is a much different story. Temp workers don’t get health insurance, vacation time or retirement benefits. They are simply paid for the limited amount of time that they are needed and then they are disposed of immediately. There has always been a role for such workers in our economy, but these days some of the biggest corporations in the entire country are getting rid of “full-time workers” and replacing them with temp workers just so that they can make a few extra bucks. As a result, the ranks of the “working poor” continue to expand, and the decline of the middle class is accelerating.
Steven Hill, a senior fellow with the New America Foundation and the author of “Raw Deal: How the Uber Economy and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers“, says that the rise of the “1099 economy”is fundamentally shifting the balance of power between employers and employees
This practice has given rise to the term “1099 economy,” since these employees don’t file W-2 income tax forms like any regular, permanent employee; instead, they receive the 1099-MISC form for an IRS classification known as “independent contractor.” The advantage for a business of using 1099 workers over W-2 wage-earners is obvious: an employer usually can lower its labor costs dramatically, often by 30 percent or more, since it is not responsible for a 1099 worker’s health benefits, retirement, unemployment or injured workers compensation, lunch breaks, overtime, disability, paid sick, holiday or vacation leave and more. In addition, contract workers are paid only for the specific number of hours they spend providing labor, or completing a specific job, which increasingly are being reduced to shorter and shorter “micro-gigs.”
Yes, there have always been temp agencies. And there has always been a need for workers that can come in and do a job on a short-term basis. But today, many of the largest and wealthiest corporations in America are purposely getting rid of “full-time workers” and instead are bringing in “independent contractors” to do the exact same jobs.
In some instances, the full-time workers that get fired are actually brought back as the new “temp workers”
Merck, one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, was a vanguard of this underhanded strategy. When it came under pressure to cut costs, it sold its Philadelphia factory to a company that fired all 400 employees—and then rehired them back as independent contractors. Merck then contracted with the company to carry on making antibiotics for them, using the exact same workers.

An Arizona public-relations firm, LP&G, fired 88 percent of its staff, and then rehired them as freelancers working out of their homes, with no benefits. Even Outmagazine, the most-read gay monthly in the U.S., laid off its entire editorial staff and then rehired most of them as freelancers, without benefits and with salary cuts.
All of those companies should be absolutely disgusted with themselves.
How can the executives responsible for those decisions even sleep at night?
Don’t they understand what they are doing to people?
When you go from being a full-time worker to being on “temp status”, the changes can be quite dramatic. If this has ever happened to you, then you know what I am talking about. Having to pay “the other half” of the payroll tax or having to find your own much more expensive health insurance are just two of the big negatives that “independent contractors” have to face…
Suddenly I was responsible for paying for my own health care, arranging for my own IRAs and saving for my own retirement. I also had to pay the employer’s half of the Social Security payroll tax, as well as Medicare — nearly an extra 8 percent deducted from my income. The costs for my health-care premiums zoomed out of sight, since I was no longer part of a large health-care pool that could negotiate favorable rates.
The decline in the quality of our jobs is a theme that I have revisited repeatedly in my writing. In order for us to have a thriving middle class, we need lots of good paying middle class jobs.
But our economy is not producing many of those jobs. Instead, most of the growth has been in low paying service jobs. The Middle class in the United States is being slowly but surely shredded, and our politicians don’t seem to care. If you doubt that the middle class is falling apart, just check out the following numbers which come from my previous article entitled “Sayonara Middle Class: 22 Stunning Pieces Of Evidence That Show The Middle Class In America Is Dying“…
#1 This week we learned that for the first time ever recorded, middle class Americans make up a minority of the population. But back in 1971, 61 percent of all Americans lived in middle class households.
#2 According to the Pew Research Center, the median income of middle class households declined by 4 percent from 2000 to 2014.
#3 The Pew Research Center has also found that median wealth for middle class households dropped by an astounding 28 percent between 2001 and 2013.
#4 In 1970, the middle class took home approximately 62 percent of all income. Today, that number has plummeted to just 43 percent.
#5 There are still 900,000 fewer middle class jobs in America than there were when the last recession began, but our population has gotten significantly larger since that time.
#6 According to the Social Security Administration, 51 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year.
#7 For the poorest 20 percent of all Americans, median household wealth declined from negative 905 dollars in 2000 to negative 6,029 dollars in 2011.
#8 A recent nationwide survey discovered that 48 percent of all U.S. adults under the age of 30 believe that “the American Dream is dead”.
#9 At this point, the U.S. only ranks 19th in the world when it comes to median wealth per adult.
#10 Traditionally, entrepreneurship has been one of the engines that has fueled the growth of the middle class in the United States, but today the level of entrepreneurship in this country is sitting at an all-time low.
#11 If you can believe it, the 20 wealthiest people in this country now have more money than the poorest 152 million Americans combined.
#12 The top 0.1 percent of all American families have about as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent of all American families combined.
#13 If you have no debt and you also have ten dollars in your pocket, that gives you a greater net worth than about 25 percent of all Americans.
#14 The number of Americans that are living in concentrated areas of high poverty has doubled since the year 2000.
#15 An astounding 48.8 percent of all 25-year-old Americans still live at home with their parents.
#16 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 49 percent of all Americans now live in a home that receives money from the government each month, and nearly 47 million Americans are living in poverty right now.
#17 In 2007, about one out of every eight children in America was on food stamps. Today, that number is one out of every five.
#18 According to Kathryn J. Edin and H. Luke Shaefer, the authors of a new book entitled “$2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America“, there are 1.5 million “ultrapoor” households in the United States that live on less than two dollars a day. That number has doubled since 1996.
#19 46 million Americans use food banks each year, and lines start forming at some U.S. food banks as early as 6:30 in the morning because people want to get something before the food supplies run out.
#20 The number of homeless children in the U.S. has increased by 60 percent over the past six years.
#21 According to Poverty USA, 1.6 million American children slept in a homeless shelter or some other form of emergency housing last year.
#22 The median net worth of families in the United States was $137, 955 in 2007. Today, it is just $82,756.
So is there a solution?
Is our transition to a “1099 economy” inevitable?
.

Ann Coulter - THE NEW YORK TIMES' FEATURED SYRIAN REFUGEE OF THE WEEK

http://www.anncoulter.com/ann_coulter.jpg

We Americans are suckers for a hard luck story.  If you can get an American to feel sorry for you by telling him a convincing enough sob story, especially if you come from another country, he will hand you the keys to his house. And then he’ll be absolutely shocked and  surprised when he comes home to find out you robbed him blind and split.



On Christmas Day -- three weeks after the son of a Pakistani immigrant and his Pakistani immigrant bride murdered 14 people in San Bernardino, California -- The New York Times told the heartwarming story of "Kamal," a Syrian refugee who resettled into Houston, Texas, earlier this year and immediately started shopping at Walmart.

The Times considers it tacky when actual Americans go to Walmart, but Muslim immigrants seem to live there, buying nothing but American flags and Christmas trees.

Thus, we're told Kamal has an outdoor Christmas tree from Walmart, and we find him carrying two trays of cupcakes from Kroger's for his children's elementary school holiday party.

Kamal -- like the Times -- was "angered" by Texans' reluctance to accept more Syrian refugees. He says of Americans: "Why did you bring me here and why then you let the people hate us?"

We brought you here, Kamal, because the Democrats need voters and the rich need cheap servants.

As for letting "the people" hate refugees, they don't, but if they did they'd have a right to do so. It goes back to that whole thing with John Locke, John Milton and the English Bill of Rights in 1689. (Of course, in Syria, it's always the year 400, so this is merely pedagogical.)

The reasons Americans might hate Muslims -- although, again, they don't -- include: San Bernardino, the Boston Marathon, Fort Hood, the Chattanooga military recruiting center, 9/11 and the 1993 World Trade Center attacks, and on and on and on.

The Times article itself provides additional clues as to why Texans might not want more Syrian refugees.

According to the Times:

-- Kamal refused to let the Times use his last name "because he feared for the safety of his relatives in Syria."

-- In 2011, Kamal was arrested and imprisoned by the Syrian military for protesting against the government. Over the next 14 months, he says, he was tortured with electric shocks and beatings -- and the removal of his kidney "as a punishment."

-- He says he didn't want to relocate to another part of Syria because the Syrians there would "slaughter" him and his family because he drinks alcohol and his wife doesn't always wear a hijab.

But he's baffled that Texans are not yelping with joy at the prospect of bringing another 100,000 Syrians here. Why would any country not jump at the chance to admit masses of people who administer electric shocks and remove organs as punishment for protesting the government? We must be crazy!

If anyone hates Syrians, it's Kamal. He left his home to get 7,000 miles away from Syrians -- whom he now wants to bring to the U.S.

By contrast, these are the horrors Kamal has suffered at the hands of Texans, which he shared with the Times: The Texas agriculture commissioner posted pictures of refugees and rattlesnakes on Facebook with the caption: "Can you tell me which of these rattlers won't bite you?"

Well, can you? Kamal can't. He voted with his feet by getting the hell out of his entire country, which -- again -- he now wants to import to Texas, at least according to the Times.

I'm going to give Kamal the benefit of the doubt. (The guy does have a Christmas tree.) Maybe it's the Ramadan spirit, but I don't think he does want any more Syrian refugees. Maybe Kamal is only worried about Texans suspecting him, in which case, he ought to be "angered" by the Muslim immigrants who do things that create suspicion, and the U.S. government that insists on bringing in hundreds of thousands more like them.

Only in fiscal years 2009 to 2013, the Obama administration has imported 680,000 immigrants from Muslim-majority countries. In that same time period, the government accepted approximately 12 immigrants from the British Isles.

The media's persistent attempts to paint sympathetic portraits of the Third-Worlders pouring into America are always exercises in self-contradiction.

On one hand, the Times loves to provide lavishly detailed accounts of the atrocities committed on a daily basis in backward countries in order to pull at readers' heartstrings. But then they're shocked when readers don't respond to descriptions of these medieval cultures by saying, What this country needs is more electric shock torture and organ harvesting of prisoners. How about we bring in some more Syrians?

The day after the Times' story about Kamal and his trays of cupcakes and rafts of grievances, the paper ran a front-page story about the "flawed justice" -- that was in the title -- involving a homicidal mob in Afghanistan.

First, the good news: No police officers shot any unarmed black teens. Now, the bad news: A 27-year-old woman, Farkhunda Malikzada, was beaten to death by an enraged mob in Kabul after being falsely accused of burning a Koran.

The Times reports:

"In the videos, Farkhunda seems at first to be screaming in pain from the kicks, but then her body convulses under the blows, and soon she stops moving at all. Even when the mob pulls her into the street and gets a car to run over her, and she is dragged 300 feet, the police stand by.

"By then, she was little more than a clothed mass of blood and bones. Yet still more people came to beat her. One of the most fervent was a young man, Mohammad Yaqoub, who worked at an eyeglasses shop. He heard the crowd as Farkhunda was dragged behind the car and rushed out, eager to join."

Let's get Yaqoub here. He can work at Lens Crafters!

But the Times is scratching its head, incredulous that Americans aren't leaping with ecstasy at the government's plan to continue dumping these sick, sadistic cultures on us.

Trump: Is There a Brick Wall Getting in Your Way?


You can walk over the wall or you can obliterate it.
I have to say that I love Donald Trump and have enjoyed every minute of his being a thorn in the side of his opponents of every political persuasion. Case in point: Roger Simon has a post on Trump exposing the lies and hypocrisy of the Clintons:
Not only that, she is accusing her putative opponent Donald Trump of sexism. This is the woman who blamed her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky on the "vast right-wing conspiracy," apparently imputing magical-mystical aphrodisiac powers to conservatives.
The Donald — you'll be surprised to hear if you've been living on Pluto — has been firing back, sweeping Mr. Hillary, now supposedly about to stump for his wife, into the fray.
"You look at whether it's Monica Lewinsky or Paula Jones or many of them," Trump said on NBC's TODAY. "That certainly will be fair game. Certainly if they play the woman's card with respect to me, that will be fair game."
In recent days, the GOP front-runner has been highlighting the former president's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, saying that Bill Clinton has a pattern of "abuse of women."
As Roger's post points out, Clinton has met his match in Trump--he doesn't back down. But this should come as no surprise to those of us who have read the books on success that Trump has written in the past. I am in the middle of re-reading Trump's business book Think Like a Champion: An Informal Education in Business and Life where he lays out his tactics for dealing with others who don't want you getting in their way:
"Sometimes you just have to be tough. I use the example of a brick wall. Is there a brick wall getting in our way? Fine. That happens. But you have a choice. You can walk away from the wall. You can go over the wall. You can go under the wall. You can go around the wall. You can also obliterate the wall. In other words, don't let anything get in your way. Get a balance, and the let the positive outdistance the negative."
I think many of us are watching Trump obliterate the wall that is Bill and Hillary. I hope he succeeds.

Teenage Islamist 'poster girl' who fled Austria was used as sex slave

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/11/24/12/2EC45B7300000578-0-image-a-2_1448368937902.jpg

Samra Kesinovic, 17, who fled home to join ISIS was used as a sex slave by the terrorist group before she was beaten to death, a former prisoner has revealed.

·  Samra Kesinovic, 17, from Vienna, fled home to join the terrorist group
·  Along with friend Sabina Selimovic, 15, they became 'poster girls' for ISIS 
·  Miss Kesinovic was killed by ISIS as she tried to flee stronghold of Raqqa 
·  Prior to her death, she was forced to be sex slave, an extremist has said 

4 Trends To Look Out For In 2016


The scales are tipping in our favor. In 2014, the only mainstream resistance I could identify with was gamergate, but in 2015 not only did gamergate grow in size and become a sort of media watchdog, but Donald Trump showered the masses with pro-masculine ideas while the cuckservative meme rattled the “conservative” establishment. In addition, thanks to the help of many of you, we were able to humiliate thousands of SJW’s in Canada alongside mayors and politicians by defying their demand to not hold lectures there. If you look back to 2012 and 2013, there was no real victory we could claim, but they are now starting to pile up.
For 2016, we’ll see several more clashes with the mainstream, though we may take heavier casualties in some battles as the enemy is well aware of our growing strength. Here are some important trends to look for:

1. Violent resistance in Europe

Once summer hits, and the migrants get back in their George Soros Lifeboats ™ to head for the European mainland, expect a nationalist movement to be created seemingly out of thin air from individuals who didn’t previously consider themselves to be nationalists.
Blue pill Westerners go along with multiculturalism because it makes them feel moral and warm on the inside, but only if it doesn’t decrease the satisfaction of their lives or their standard of living. Once that starts to occur—and it will—they will jump ship and support a nationalist movement. Look not only in Germany and Sweden for this to happen, but also Austria, Denmark, and theNetherlands.

2. Peak social justice

Social Justice Warriors served as fine useful idiots for the past several years, but they have begun lashing out against the hands that feed them. Two recent instances that come to mind is Chicago SJW’s demanding the resignation of Democratic mayor Rahm Emmanuel and a British university students trying to ban an establishment feminist from speaking.
The SJW’s in the media and government will start to sabotage and mock the “extreme SJW’s” on the ground whom they can no longer control, suddenly remembering concepts like free speech and due process which they neglected when implanting themselves in their march through the institutions. Both groups will distract each other with battles that achieve nothing. I will absolutely not aid establishment SJW’s defeat their little Frankensteins, likely starting with the Black Lives Matter movement, which will be dismantled in similar fashion as Occupy Wall Street in the second half of 2016.
While SJW influence is still strong, and will continue to persecute innocent individuals who stand against them, their power peaked in early 2015. Between 2010-2014, they saw nonstop victories, but now infighting between themselves and a resurgent resistance will weaken them greatly.

3. Stopping Donald Trump

There is no way they will let Trump win. Now that they know the media alone is unable to stop him, they will simply get a mainstream Republican to run as an Independent to ensure Hillary wins. Even if that Independent candidate only siphons 5% of the vote, it will be enough to ensure that Trump loses based on the current voting demographic. The only chance Trump has is if communist Bernie Sanders runs as an Independent, which is very possible since the old man knows that this is his last shot at being president for a Democratic establishment that has begun pulling the strings against him.
Trump losing would not be a total loss for us, because it would awaken millions of people to the corruption of the media and establishment parties while setting the stage for future politicians to use Trump’s campaign as a template for local elections. Those politicians could some day challenge Federal power. Maybe some of you will take his platform and run for local office.

4. Degradation of mainstream entertainment

Mainstream entertainment, particularly movies, will become intolerable to watch as Hollywood writers jam in every politically correct trope they can find. There will be a moment, which I have already personally experienced, where you can’t watch any new movie made in America.
I was on a trans-Atlantic flight recently and attempted to watch the new Mad Max movie. There was nothing shocking in it compared to other recent politically correct films, but the part I had to shut it off was when Max failed to fire a gun with correct aim and needed help from a female, who proceeded to hit the target in one shot. Fake. After turning off my screen in disgust, I got into a conversation with my seatmate, a 65 year old woman. Hollywood has gotten so bad that talking to an elderly person was more entertaining than the tripe they put out.
As a man who still likes a good story, I find myself without movie options, especially since I’ve seen many of the masculine classics. We may reach a point in the next year or two where it becomes financially viable for us to produce independent films.
Conclusion
It’s fun to make predictions because when you’re right, you feel an ego boost after announcing to the world that you are like Nostradamus, but the trends I noted above are mere logical continuations from what we have been seeing in the past two years. Of course history does not operate on a straight line, but I’d confidently bet on the above.
Either way, the culture war will certainly get more intense. I had one big fight this year, and for the next year, I’m prepared to fight several more. I hope you are as ready as I am.

Vox Popoli: As in Europe, so in America

Good point. America is a propositional country. The citizens of America are largely united by support for the idea of a country were the people control the government, not the other way around. Many came here for the economic opportunities in the country afforded by its abundant recourses and free market economy. Opportunities for common people to better their condition that did not exist in their countries of origin. Other than that the residents of America are not united by a common ethnicity or even a common language an increasing number of cases. What will serve to hold America together if and when it comes to pass that there is no longer a common agreement on how the country should be run? Could it even hold together under such circumstances?



Patrick Buchanan sees a similar future to the one John Red Eagle and I predicted in Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America:
What was predicted, 14 years ago, has come to pass.

Migrants into Germany from the Middle and Near East reached 1 million in 2015. EU bribes to the Turks to keep Muslim migrants from crossing over to the Greek islands, thence into the Balkans and Central Europe, are unlikely to stop the flood.

My prediction that European “patriots will recapture control of their national destinies,” looks even more probable today.

Prime Minister David Cameron, who almost lost a referendum on Scottish secession, is demanding a return of British sovereignty from the EU sufficient to satisfy his countrymen, who have been promised a vote on whether to abandon the European Union altogether.

Marine Le Pen’s anti-EU National Front ran first in the first round of the 2015 French elections. Many Europeans believe she will make it into the final round of the next presidential election in 2017.

Anti-immigrant, right-wing parties are making strides all across Europe, as the EU is bedeviled by a host of crises.

Europe’s open borders that facilitate free trade also assure freedom of travel to homegrown terrorists.

Mass migration into the EU is causing member nations to put up checkpoints and close borders. The Schengen Agreement on the free movement of goods and people is being ignored or openly violated.

The economic and cultural clash between a rich northern Europe and a less affluent south — Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal — manifest in the bad blood between Athens and Berlin, endures.

Northern Europeans grow weary of repeated bailouts of a south that chafes at constant northern demands for greater austerity.

Then there is the surge of sub-nationalism, as in Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders, and Veneto, where peoples seek to disconnect from distant capitals that no longer speak for them, and reconnect with languages, traditions and cultures that give more meaning to their lives than the economics-uber-alles ideology of Frau Angela Merkel.

Moreover, the migrants entering Europe, predominantly Islamic and Third World, are not assimilating as did the European and largely Christian immigrants to America of a century ago.

The enclaves of Asians in Britain, Africans and Arabs around Paris, and Turks in and around Berlin seem to be British, French and German in name only. And some of their children are now heeding the call to jihad against the Crusaders invading Muslim lands.

The movement toward deeper European integration appears to have halted, and gone into reverse, as the EU seems to be unraveling along ideological, national, tribal and historic lines.

If these trends continue, and they seem to have accelerated in 2015, the idea of a United States of Europe dies, and with it the EU.

And this raises a question about the most successful economic and political union in history - the USA.

How does an increasingly multiracial, multiethnic, multilingual, multicultural United States avoid the fate to which Europe appears to be headed, when there is no identifiable racial or ethnic majority here in 2042?
The USA cannot survive in its current form because an idea is not a nation.