Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Interview with Anne Richard (Asst. Sec. of State) is revealing!

https://refugeeresettlementwatch.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/anne-richard-cspan.jpg

The fact is the Irish WERE drunkards, hot-heads, work-shy, lacking in skills and education, prone to be boastful and exaggerate their abilities and criminally inclined as well. There were a lot of unwed mothers among the Irish. Imagine how these problems would have been exacerbated had they been subsidized by a welfare state such as exists today?  Many Irish were also terrorists and conspirators who sought to drag America into a war with the British Empire (the Finnian Brotherhood attacked Canada from U.S. territory). Their presence was highly disruptive to American society, even despite the fact that the much of the country was still unsettled during the Irish migration. It is only through  good luck and the herculean efforts of Irish Catholic clergy and Irish secular leaders that the Irish were able to reform themselves and assimilate successfully into America’s dominant Anglo-Saxon culture. Plus there was a conspicuous lack of public support for BAD behavior by immigrants, unlike today. Keep in mind there was no “Irish Lives Matter” movement seeking to make victims of Irish criminals back then. So why do 21st Century American leaders want to repeat the errors of the past and put the country at even greater risk of destabilization by importing immigrants who are even more alien and intractable than even the Irish were?

_________________________________________________________________________

Interview with Anne Richard (Asst. Sec. of State) is revealing!

Posted by Ann Corcoran on April 14, 2016
We learn that Irish immigrants at one time were as dangerous for America as Islamic terrorists and that refugee kids are cute!
I just want to give you two quotes from the woman who is at the top of the food chain when it comes to bringing third worlders to your towns.
Anne Richard is the Asst. Secretary of State for Population, Refugees and Migration. She is one of several government employees involved with refugee resettlement who move in and out of government as employees first of federal contractors. (She was previously a VP at the International Rescue Committee.)
This is an interview with NPR where she knows her emotion-driven audience:
First, while responding to questions about terrorists getting in to the US as Syrian refugees, she equates the situation now with when the Irish came to America in large numbers (an aside: always remember that when the great waves of Irish came, they could not access welfare!).
Here she suggests that fear of them at the time is on the same level as our fear of ISIS today.
RICHARD: No, I think we’re trying to put together the best program possible. What I worry about the political discussion is it endangers this American tradition. And we have seen in the past that, you know, the Irish were too dangerous to bring in because they were going to be drunkards and hotheaded and backward.
And, further along in the interview, she demonstrates that she is driven by emotion (or at least trained to use that appeal)!
To me, to us, this is about being clear-eyed about the economic and social welfare of our communities.  This is about public policy decision-making.  This is about the costs to our economy. This is about whether there are unemployed Americans seeking work.
This is not about whether immigrants are nice people or their kids are cute!  
One of their favorite tricks (watch for it in your community) when you question the wisdom of inviting large numbers of impoverished people to your town, is that they want to drag out the poor refugees/immigrants as pawns to parade them before you in order to pull on your heart strings.
Here is Richard’s revealing comment to NPR:
RICHARD: Well, I meet a lot of refugees. And I find that when people meet refugees, they get it. They get the fact that these are families and that these are people who are really struggling and that they are resilient because they’ve already survived getting out of their countries. And so I think that Americans need to see more of the faces of refugees like I have. When you meet the individuals, the families, they have kids that are cute. They have grandparents who are wise. They have parents who are caring and want to help everybody.
I am sure all of those things are true, but they still don’t stack up to a clear-eyed economic analysis about whether mass migration of very needy people is good for American wise grandparents, caring parents, and cute children!
One more thought (I’m laughing when I think of it!):  Imagine the next time there is a refugee-promoting meeting in your town, and you bring out some impoverished senior citizens, some out of work vets, a few disabled Americans in need of subsidized housing and some poor/hungry American children to demonstrate your point.  Can you imagine the howls of outrage on the other side that we might play their same game!

No comments:

Post a Comment