This begs the question of how exactly will the military plan against “climate change”? The Left fervently believes in the existence of anthropogenic (made-made) climate change. Given that, does the Left propose to prevent anthropogenic climate change by using the U.S. military to eliminate the primary agent said change: i.e. human beings? Hey… just asking.
The Pentagon is ordering the top brass to incorporate climate change into virtually everything they do, from testing weapons to training troops to war planning to joint exercises with allies.A new directive’s theme: The U.S. Armed Forces must show “resilience” and beat back the threat based on “actionable science.”It says the military will not be able to maintain effectiveness unless the directive is followed. It orders the establishment of a new layer of bureaucracy — a wide array of “climate change boards, councils and working groups” to infuse climate change into “programs, plans and policies.”
This makes perfect sense when resources are free, and you have no threat. The problems will only arise as you approach a time when resources are going to be non-existent, and threats may be everywhere.
The most unfortunate aspect of the r/K mechanism is that it adapts brains to times of r, and once r-adapted, they are totally incapable of acting with foresight of the return of K-selective conditions. Here, it is highly likely that once the US National debt passes $24 Trillion, in roughly 4 years, an economic and governmental collapse will be unavoidable. Having all the extra billions this climate nonsense is going to waste saved up in a secret account could feed a lot of destitute Americans at that time, and ameliorate a lot of pain in the collapse. But as would be expected in times of r, it will all be wasted now, never to be seen again.
Then again, what would life be without a little Apocalypse?
No comments:
Post a Comment